Studies of Theorem Proving under Limited Resources
Decision Theory Group
Redmond, Washington 98052-6399
Center for the Study of Language and Information
Stanford, California 94305
Author Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
In earlier work, we introduced flexible inference and decision-theoretic metareasoning to address the intractability of normative inference. Here, rather than pursuing the task of computing beliefs and actions with decision models composed of distinctions about uncertain events, we examine methods for inferring beliefs about mathematical truth before an automated theorem prover completes
a proof. We employ a Bayesian analysis to update belief in truth, given theorem-proving progress, and show how decision-theoretic methods can be used to determine the value of continuing to deliberate versus taking immediate action in time-critical situations.
Keywords: Theorem proving, control of theorem proving, time-critical reasoning, Bayesian methods, decision making under bounded resources, decision-theoretic methods, Polya
In: Proceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, August 1995, pages 306-314. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco.